<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Lively Debate</title>
	<link>http://www.livelydebate.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Economics and Philosophy with a tech flavor</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Tricky Negotiations</title>
		<link>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/10/06/tricky-negotiations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/10/06/tricky-negotiations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Misc</category>
	<category>Entertainment</category>
		<guid>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/10/06/tricky-negotiations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	What happens when we outsource the most intimate of negotiations?

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What happens when we outsource <a href='http://www.glumbert.com/media/consent'>the most intimate of negotiations</a>?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/10/06/tricky-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sci Fi finds a way to kill Battlestar Galactica</title>
		<link>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/04/27/sci-fi-finds-a-way-to-kill-battlestar-galactica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/04/27/sci-fi-finds-a-way-to-kill-battlestar-galactica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Entertainment</category>
		<guid>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/04/27/sci-fi-finds-a-way-to-kill-battlestar-galactica/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I really like the Battlestar Galactica show on the Sci Fi channel.  It is amazingly good for an offering on that channel and stands up as one of the best shows on television, if not the best.  Ever since I realized that Battlestar Galactica was good, I've been wondering how the Sci Fi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really like the Battlestar Galactica show on the Sci Fi channel.  It is amazingly good for an offering on that channel and stands up as one of the best shows on television, if not the best.  Ever since I realized that Battlestar Galactica was good, I've been wondering how the Sci Fi channel (and their parent, NBC) would wreck the show.</p>
	<p>Now, I know.  Sci Fi has <a href='http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-scifi-galacticaprequel,0,6083698.story?coll=zap-news-headlines'>announced</a> that they will be running a prequel along side Battlestar Galactica.  Great way to <a href='http://www.jumptheshark.com/'>Jump the Shark</a>, by diluting and distracting their talent and tiring out their audience.</p>
	<p>More is not always better.  Just ask Paramount, owners of the played out Star Trek franchise, or Donald Trump and his rapidly waning Apprentice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2006/04/27/sci-fi-finds-a-way-to-kill-battlestar-galactica/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Pioneers a New Market</title>
		<link>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2005/10/14/apple-pioneers-a-new-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2005/10/14/apple-pioneers-a-new-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Economics</category>
	<category>Entertainment</category>
		<guid>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2005/10/14/apple-pioneers-a-new-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I am continuously impressed by how well run the new Apple is.  I find it entertaining to follow the Apple pre-announcement rumor mill, but I was a bit busy for Wednesday's video iPod announcement.  The television part of the announcement caught me by surprise.  Most of the speculation that I had seen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am continuously impressed by how well run the new Apple is.  I find it entertaining to follow the Apple pre-announcement rumor mill, but I was a bit busy for Wednesday's video iPod announcement.  The television part of the announcement caught me by surprise.  Most of the speculation that I had seen regarding a video ipod centered around movies or music videos.  If it had been just that, I would say "so what" or "who cares?"  There are many avenues of distribution for movies and movie downloads doomed to be slow and time consuming.  No story here.  I didn't even tune in.</p>
	<p>Television is different.</p>
	<p>The market for television episodes today parallels the market for songs when Apple first entered it with iTunes Music Store.  Buying television shows on DVD is <a href='http://www.billboard.com/bb/charts/videos/dvd.jsp'>increasingly popular</a>.  Fox canceled the show 'Firefly' after showing only 11 of 14 episodes.  Strong DVD sales, over 500,000, enabled the show to brought back this fall in the form of the Serenity movie.  However, buying these television DVDs requires purchasing a season.  Much like CDs are sold in albums.   Apple's innovation is to offer the sale by episode, just as they offered to sell music by song.</p>
	<p>Is there a demand for this?  You bet.  Through a Tivo overbooking I missed Survivor this week.  I would happily pay $2 to see it before next week.  Would I buy a survivor DVD?  Not a chance.   Is everybody at work talking about a show last night that you missed?  Two bucks lets you see what you missed.  A PVR doesn't help you if you don't realize that you wanted to watch something until after it airs.</p>
	<p>The key is the content producers.  Will they opt in?  I suspect they will.  Why leave money on the table?  Its also another way to compete with the commercial skipping capability of PVRs.  Mark Cuban calls downloadable television the <a href='http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000617063228/'>Savior of Network TV</a>.</p>
	<p>Along with the video iPods, Apple released a new remote control and some media center control software.  There are some folks lamenting that Apple did not go all the way and offer the ability to record broadcast television.  I think Apple is smart to stay out of the treacherous and <a href='http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2005-08-24-tivo_x.htm?csp=34'>mildly profitable</a> PVR market.  The cable and satellite companies are strong competitors.  The combination Tuner/PVR boxes work better.  Until the alternative technology is ready (<a href='http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/specsformats/CableCARDprimer.php'>cable card</a>), Apple is better off leaving PVRs to others rather than releasing an inferior product.  </p>
	<p>The other problem with an Apple PVR lies in how cable boxes are sold.  The cable/satellite companies subsidize the initial box purchase with a subscription contract.  It would be hard for Apple to compete up front with a more expensive box.  I'm not sure that all of the conditions will ever be right for an Apple PVR.  If the time ever does come, It is worth keeping in mind that Apple wasn't first with an MP3 player.  They need not enter a PVR market early to do well.</p>
	<p>Apple is better off creating a new market without competition than entering an existing market with strong competition and no clear advantage.</p>
	<p><strong>Update:</strong><br />
Ok, without competition may be a bit strong.  Microsoft touts their available content in last week's announcement for <a href='http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/oct05/10-14DigitalLifePR.mspx'>Update Rollup 2 for Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005</a>.   (Someone needs to teach Microsoft how to name things.)  Topping the list is <a href='http://www.akimbo.com/'>Akimbo</a>, an on-demand video subscription service.  Apple has beat out the subscription model with pay per download in music.  Can they do the same in video?</p>
	<p>Following up on the well run company theme, Chuq Von Rospach, a long time Apple Employee summarizes a <a href='http://chuqui.typepad.com/teal_sunglasses/2005/10/technovia_apple.html'>history of Apple CEOs</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2005/10/14/apple-pioneers-a-new-market/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sci fi wrapup</title>
		<link>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/10/23/sci-fi-wrapup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/10/23/sci-fi-wrapup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Entertainment</category>
		<guid>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/10/23/sci-fi-wrapup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	James Robertson blogs about Enterprise and Farscape: The PeaceKeeper Wars.
	The Peace Keeper wars does seem to tie up the FarScape series.  I've just finished Tivoing the whole series.  I can now say i've seen them all.  I really enjoyed the show as a whole.  I think that it had outstanding writing, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>James Robertson blogs about <a href='http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/userblogs/mls/blogView?showComments=true&#038;entry=3275920277'>Enterprise</a> and <a href='http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&#038;entry=3275894607'>Farscape: The PeaceKeeper Wars</a>.</p>
	<p>The Peace Keeper wars does seem to tie up the FarScape series.  I've just finished Tivoing the whole series.  I can now say i've seen them all.  I really enjoyed the show as a whole.  I think that it had outstanding writing, characterization, and creativity.   I thought the capping mini-serious was a little too fast and tried to cover too much ground.  Its like they took their outline for an entire season and condensed it into 4 episodes.  I think it would have been an incredible season.  Some things that they didn't quite pull off in the mini-series (Rigel's temporary pregnancy) would have worked in a more extended format.</p>
	<p>I watched the first few episodes of Enterprise, but that series has just never caught my attention.  I have always been a trek fan, but the show is just boring.  They need to bring in a new creative team.  The series <a href='http://www.jumptheshark.com/'>jumped the shark</a> to corporate franchise dull.</p>
	<p>I've also been Tivoing the Angel series.  I am a huge Buffy fan.  However, last nights <a href='http://www.tvtome.com/Angel/season5.html#ep108'>episode</a> stunk.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/10/23/sci-fi-wrapup/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cliches of Science Fiction and Horror</title>
		<link>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/05/08/the-cliches-of-science-fiction-and-horror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/05/08/the-cliches-of-science-fiction-and-horror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 05:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Entertainment</category>
		<guid>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/05/08/the-cliches-of-science-fiction-and-horror/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Armed with this page for science fiction and this page for horror, I wonder if its possible to create a metric for television science fiction shows:  percent cliche episodes per season.
	PCES: A scientific method for determining when your favorite sci fi show has Jumped the Shark?
	(Cliche links via boing boing)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Armed with <a href='http://www.strangehorizons.com/guidelines/fiction-common.shtml'>this page for science fiction</a> and <a href='http://www.strangehorizons.com/guidelines/fiction-common-horror.shtml'>this page for horror</a>, I wonder if its possible to create a metric for television science fiction shows:  percent cliche episodes per season.</p>
	<p>PCES: A scientific method for determining when your favorite sci fi show has <a href='http://www.jumptheshark.com/'>Jumped the Shark</a>?</p>
	<p>(Cliche links via <a href='http://www.boingboing.net/2004/05/07/todays_received_wisd.html'>boing boing</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.livelydebate.com/archives/2004/05/08/the-cliches-of-science-fiction-and-horror/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
